Those flocking to Erika Kirk ― like those who flocked to Phyllis Schlafly in the ’70s and ’80s ― don’t see anything hypocritical in any of this, said Donald Critchlow, a professor of history at Arizona State University and the author of Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman’s Crusade.
“Kirk and Schlafly believe women’s primary obligations should be to their families and children, while being civically engaged,” he told HuffPost. “Involvement in school boards, for instance, charities, temperance, abolitionism, and a full range of other activities.”
As Critchlow sees it, the separation between family, work outside the home, and civic engagement are “false dichotomies created by second-wave and postmodern feminism.”
Amy Binder, an SNF Agora Institute professor of sociology at Johns Hopkins University, sees the contradiction. But for conservatives, having dual roles is not as paradoxical or ideologically inconsistent as progressives might think.
“Kirk’s role as career woman is less of a contradiction because it is in service to traditional gender norms, encouraging women to be wives and mothers first,” the professor told HuffPost. “Where liberals might see contradiction in career vs. family, I suspect that Erika Kirk’s followers see womanly devotion.”
Answer honestly and see what you already know about yourself, but pretend not to.View Entire…
I hope I have some money in 2026...View Entire Post ›
"Die With a Smile" or "Abracadabra"????View Entire Post ›
Make a bunch of wintry choices, and I will give you a cold-weather destination where…
The world is witnessing a wonderful resurgence of Josh Hutcherson, and I am here for…
Or at least, it'll give it a good guess.View Entire Post ›