Ghirardelli and Starbucks (which was a whopping $8.49) were my two splurge candidates, and Ghirardelli wins it. Both of these brands offer a stark contrast to the other five in that they are far less sweet. That’s because there is very little added sugar to the powders. However, Ghirardelli edges out a win here. It makes sense that the chocolate company would be good at making hot cocoa!
What I loved:
Strong chocolate flavor – This is the most chocolate-forward of the entire bunch, even with hints of bitterness you would find in darker chocolate candy. I love dark chocolate, so this really ticked that box for me. Also, after consuming several sweet cocoas in a row, this was a refreshing change of pace.
What Could Be Improved:
Lacking the full-bodied richness of some other brands – Even with the addition of 2% milk, Ghirardelli is missing that slightly thicker consistency you expect from a hot cocoa. The combination of chocolate and fat from the milk should fill the mouth and coat the tongue. This has a consistency closer to water, which kind of takes away from the whole experience, and it certainly impacts the coziness factor of the hot cocoa that is so essential.
10. "Private equity and consultants that are paid to tell you to just lay off…
From cookies to cakes and desserts around the world, your sweet choices say more about…
"Women who say, 'I don’t follow politics, I just vote for whoever my husband (or…
If you’re in need for a caffeine boost, Rise & Grind, which is located at…
"We finally decided we needed to move on as the home we loved no longer…
Tough choice!View Entire Post ›